In 1989,
the incidence of cancer topped one million for the first time
and the number of deaths reached 500,000... yet, in the name
of orthodoxy, both new and traditional scientific theories
are suppressed, medical records seized, clinics shut down,
and innovative clinicians thrown in prison.
But while
orthodoxy appears to have all the cards money, power,
prestigious credentials, influence in the major media
the continuing failure of orthodox medicine to deal satisfactorily
with the major forms of cancer guarantees the growth of nonconventional
approaches. It is the job of the true scientist, and all those
who love truth, to take a serious and open-minded look at
all methods and claims. A million new cases a year demand
no less.
Ralph
W. Moss The Cancer Industry (1989,91)
Pulitzer Prize-Winning Author
|
Ways of Dealing with
Cancer
that I Would Explore if I Got Cancer
By
Don Bennett, DAS
Cancer
as we experience it today is unnatural, meaning, we would never
have gotten it 100,000 years ago. So it's not natural for us to
get it the way we do. So, often, it is not enough to just resort
to doing natural things like eating the diet that is natural for
us to eat to get rid of the cancer. Sometimes a person needs to
do equally unnatural things to deal with the unnatural cancer, like
the therapies listed below.
The
message that I hope you come away with from reading this page is:
There are things we can do to support the body's natural cancer
fighting mechanisms (and chemo is counterproductive in this regard),
and if done along with no longer doing the things that cause cancer,
and with doing some unnatural things to deal with cancers that have
gotten to unnatural stages (including Stage One), many cancers can
be resolved.
And
here's a helpful philosophy: We all should assume we have some cancerous
cells so that we adopt super healthy lifestyles now as opposed
to when we get a diagnosis of something serious so that we
have better odds of never having to deal with cancer in the first
place. Let's stop it in its tracks and reverse it BEFORE
we get a diagnosis of it! Much easier to do that with a "pre-actionary"
approach (vs a reactionary approach).
NOTE:
I already eat the healthiest of diets, so if someone isn't yet,
this is the first thing to do. See my articles on diet in the articles
section. And yes, the healthiest of diets contains a lot of fruit,
and no, the
sugar in fruit doesn't cause cancer or prevent you from getting
rid of cancer... it actually helps to prevent it and get rid of
it (as long as you're physically active and breathing enough fresh
air).
BOOKS
The
Cancer Industry by Ralph Moss
Cancer
Free by Bill Henderson
The
Grape Cure by Johanna Brandt
Politics
In Healing: The Suppression and Manipulation of American Medicine
by Daniel Haley (special attention should be paid to Dr.
Burzynski and this documentary)
Raw
Can Cure Cancer by Janette Murray-Wakelin (but changing to the
healthiest diet isn't the only thing you should do)
VIDEOS
The
Quest for the Cures Continues
ChrisBeatCancer.com
When
Does Sugar Feed Cancer
Second
Opinion - Interview with Ralph Moss on the corruption in the
cancer industry
(Be sure to watch the "Extras" too!
Jaw-dropping info.)
Videos
by Eric Mercola
Cancer
Can Be Killed - A film by Jeff Witzeman (see write-up below
by
Jeff)
REPORTS
Cancer Decisions:
The Moss Reports
EATING
Methionine
restriction (eat a fruit-based diet, and no, fruit
sugar doesn't cause cancer to grow)
Fasting (depending on what type of cancer it was, and I'd want to
be sure my nutrient levels were "topped off" before fasting).
Use EGCg
to reduce glutamine.
Fasting for
72 hours (protects
cancer patients against the toxic impact of chemotherapy)
Green juice therapy (consuming only green juices made with organic
greens only)
Add a worthwhile
nutritional adjunct to your diet (to compensate for the nutritionally
sub-par foods most people are buying). BTW, I do not sell it.
Grape
Diet (read the book)
A diet of a small volume of certain fruits (pineapple, raspberries,
orange pulp melons), each one eaten by itself as a meal, being VERY
careful to under-eat slightly, and NO animal foods or oils
of any kind, zero. And drink fresh lemon juice in water every morning,
and cranberry juice (not from concentrate). For EFAs, add equal
amounts of ground up hemp and chia seeds to a smoothie made from
the pineapple and raspberries. See this
video.
Apple peels (for Ursolic acid), red grapes (for Resveratrol), and
Curcumin
and Turmeric.
Sweet potatoes (even though they are usually consumed cooked, it
may be better to eat them raw so the proteins are intact. Article)
THERAPIES
Vitamin
C - either oral
liposomal
or IV
(IV
protocol) (big on my list)
Vitamin
D therapy (normalizing one's 25(OH)D level, a must, but not
with a D supplement because sunshine makes other nutrients in the
skin, like Nitric Oxide which is very important in cancer treatment.
Use a phototherapy device as discussed in the article.)
Ozone
IV Therapy (done in a clinic environment). More info here
and here.
H2O2 Therapy http://www.curezone.org/diseases/cancer/h2o2.asp
EWOT Therapy (Exercise
with Oxygen Therapy)
B17/Laetrile (apricot
seeds) (B17
capsules) (don't dismiss this)
Iodine protocol
(a must)
MSM
(sulfur) Protocol
Beta Glucan - http://www.betterwayhealth.com,
http://www.lef.org/magazine/2009/12/The-Immune-Enhancing-Benefits-of-Beta-Glucans/Page-01
Cannabidiol Oil (CBD Oil), CBDs and THC from cannabis - article,
article,
article,
resource
Proteolytic Enzymes, http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/history_of_treatment.htm,
http://drsircus.com/medicine/enzyme-therapy-for-cancer-and-digestive-diseases
Far
Infrared Therapy
Herb therapy - These tinctures from Barlow
Herbal: East Star, Esiac-20 (sold under "Max's
Power Bundle for C"). Also Turmeric
w/Black Pepper. Highly recommended.
Hyperbaric
O2 Therapy (big on my list, done
in a clinic environment)
Relaxation
Therapy (very important!)
Rebounding "therapy"
(moves lymph fluid, which is very important)
Coffee
enemas (detoxifies liver, evicts
parasites, part of the Gerson Therapy)
Turpentine
(no, not the stuff from the hardware store, but 100%
pure gum spirits of turpentine)
I'd
also look into GcMAF.
And here.
[Note: Other
GcMAF resources are no longer there. Hmmm]
And for skin cancers, beneign or malignant, or skin growths, I'd
look into Cansema
ointment ("black salve"). It works, is non-toxic, and
therefore is hated by the pharma industry, cancer treatment industry,
and by dermatologists.
I'm adding this one because, on the surface, it appears to have
efficacy, but who knows. It's a combination of Curcumin, CBD oil,
Vitamin E, and a veterinary product called Fenbendazole (an anti-parasitic
dog de-wormer). You can hear the story of how it was developed and
how it worked here,
and his website is here.
For those who
decide to do chemo, I'd investigate this first...
Fasting and chemo = better results, less damage. See http://fasten.tv/en/vortraege/longo
And maybe
Insulin
Potentiation Therapy (IPT) and here
also. This lowers
blood glucose to 40 to starve cancer cells. It's done both with
and without some chemo. The kind with chemo
uses a low strength chemo agent mixed with sugar. First, insulin
is used to bring down blood glucose to a low level, and then the
"sweet chemo lite" is taken, and the malignant cells suck
it up. This is far less toxic than standard chemo, so no hair falls
out, no nausea, no fatigue, and no loss of appetite. But this is
last on the list for obvious reasons (still subjecting the body
to a poison). But consider that fruit contains natural "chemo"
agents (substances that target cancerous cells), and the fruit sugar
gets these substances into the malignant cells, so this is a more
natural form of IPT with none of the poisonous qualities of IPT
(see the first item under "EATING" above).
NOTE:
For some of the above therapies you'll have to go outside of the
U.S. because many are not approved for use in the U.S. Fortunately
there are some clinics just over the border in Mexico, but this
is a case of "Buyer Beware". Do your due diligence and
vet the clinic you're considering working with. Some are great,
and some are to be avoided. And some therapies can be done at home
if you learn the "how to's" and purchase the equipment/supplement.
Consider using a counselor that can help you navigate this, such
as this
one or this
one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The
above info in a paragraph
When someone gets a diagnosis of cancer, besides doing some fasting,
I'd also explore: A zero dairy and animal foods diet, high dose
vitamin C therapy (either liposomal or IV), Vitamin D therapy (normalizing
one's 25(OH)D level using a phototherapy device), B17/Laetrile,
Beta Glucan, Cannabidiol, Insulin therapy (to lower blood glucose
to 40 to starve cancer cells), Proteolytic Enzymes, Ozone Therapy,
H2O2 Therapy, Far Infrared
Therapy, Hyperbaric O2 Therapy, Relaxation Therapy (very important!),
Green Juice Therapy, some coffee enemas (detoxifies liver), and
if you must have some chemo to make your oncologist happy, then
maybe Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT, a type of low toxicity
chemo that is more effective than standard chemo), but a fruit-based
diet is better than IPT. These have been shown to be far more effective
than the standard-of-care conventional treatments, and yet they
are categorized as "woo-woo" quack medicine supposedly
because they are dangerous... and they are, but not to us, they're
dangerous to the profit margins of the medical and pharma industries.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
General
Advice to Avoid Cancer (better than having to get rid of
it)
1. Keep your
internal environment healthy. Eat organically grown whole foods
(fruits and leafy greens). Avoid GMOs. Stay away from processed
foods. Since food matters but nutrition matters too, I add a nutritional
complement to my diet of fruits and greens to compensate for
the nutritionally sub-par food I get from the agri-based food industry
that grows for yield, size, appearance, shelf-life, growth-rate,
pest-resistance, and sugar-content but not for nutritional
content (because there's no profit incentive to do so, and it's
not mandated by government).
2. Detoxify
the body via healthy living, appropriate amounts of physical activity
and being properly hydrated. Research has led many scientists to
conclude that jumping on a mini-trampoline (i.e. rebounding)
is possibly the most effective exercise devised by man, especially
because of the effect rebounding has on the lymph system.
3. Get sufficient
sunshine. Vitamin D is automatically produced when the cholesterol
in your skin absorbs the ultraviolet B (UVB) rays from the sun.
It then circulates throughout your body to help prevent cancer (and
other diseases). It's interesting to note that your body automatically
produces just the right amount of vitamin D. If you live where the
sun can't make adequate amounts of D in your skin all year 'round
(and many people do), get a phototherapy
device that mimics sunshine. I don't recommend a D supplement
as the best thing you can do when the sun isn't strong enough because
they don't contain all the other nutrients that sunshine makes in
your skin that we need for optimal health, so get a phototherapy
device.
5. Sleep.
Get enough. And stop doing the things that can interfere with deep
sleep (where the bulk of the nervous system energy is replenished;
this "nerve energy" is used to power your healing processes,
if you don't have enough, over time cancerous cells can become "cancer"
as we know it today.
6. Manage stress.
Unmanaged stress depresses/blunts the immune system and raises the
odds of getting cancer. And one thing that can greatly reduce stress
is remembering that you are not battling cancer, you are simply
healing from it. Battles can be lost, but as long as your body is
not past the point of being able to heal, healing always works if
you know what to do, and you do it.
Related
articles:
Iodine
and Cancer
Milk
and Breast Cancer
Some
Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry
New
Prostate Cancer Studies Implicating Dairy Products
Homogenized
Milk: Rocket Fuel for Cancer
Bras
and Breast Cancer
Reasons
Why Women Should Not Get a Mammogram
Fact
or Fiction?
"Cancer and other degenerative diseases can be managed
successfully only by the medical/pharmaceutical industries."
Healthy
Diet Studies
You
Are What You Eat
The
Number One Cause of Cancer
And
I must re-post this article...
Unbelievable
scam of cancer industry blown wide open: $100 billion a year spent
on toxic chemotherapy for many FAKE diagnoses... National Cancer
Institute's shocking admission affects millions of patients
by Mike Adams
With $100 billion
a year now being spent on toxic chemotherapy treatments that damage
patients and cause "chemo brain" side effects, a panel
of cancer experts commissioned by the National Cancer Institute
publicly admitted two years ago that tens of millions of "cancer
cases" aren't cancer at all.
Tens of millions
of people who have been diagnosed with "cancer" by crooked
oncologists -- and scared into medically unjustified but extremely
profitable chemotherapy treatments -- never had any sort of life-threatening
condition to begin with, scientists have confirmed.
"The word
'cancer' often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process;
however, cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths,
not all of which progress to metastases and death, and include indolent
disease that causes no harm during the patient's lifetime,"
says the abstract of the published study entitled Overdiagnosis
and Overtreatment in Cancer An Opportunity for Improvement (JAMA.
2013;310(8):797-798. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.108415)
The article
goes on to explain that many tissue lesions in human biology are
being diagnosed with the scary-sounding term "cancer"
even though they would not lead to any real harm in the body even
if left untreated.
$100 billion
a year generated by the cancer industry to treat many patients who
never had "real" cancer in the first place
Oncologists
and the breast cancer industry prey on systematic over-diagnosis
of cancer in order to scare patients into unnecessary treatments.
These treatments are helping generate $100 billion a year in
chemotherapy revenues, often for so-called "cancers"
that shouldn't even count as cancer in the first place. [Many people
believe that medical doctors don't make any money on the prescriptions
they write, and that's true EXCEPT for chemotherapy that is done
in the doctor's office
in this scenario, the doctor is allowed
to profit from the use of the chemo drugs! Could there be a financial
incentive to over-diagnose cancer by these docs?]
"Physicians,
patients and the general public must recognize that overdiagnosis
is common and occurs more frequently with cancer screening,"
warns the NCI-commissioned science article in JAMA.
A 2002 editorial
in the Annals of Internal Medicine maintained that the efficacy
of mammograms for younger women is an open question. "The debate
is worth following closely," concluded the editor of the journal,
"because women are deciding about breast cancer screening,
and it's our role to keep them informed as best we can." Yet
it is worth remembering that "mammography screening may lead
to an overdiagnosis of breast cancer, that is, the detection of
a tumor that would not have become clinically detectable in the
patient's lifetime." - from the book "What If Medicine
Disappeared" by Gerald E Markle.
Cancer industry
runs on scientific quackery and sleazy fear-based sales tactics
to recruit patients
This all confirms
what I've said over and over again as a consumer health advocate:
The cancer industry uses scare tactics that smack of "medical
terrorism" to recruit frightened women and men into unnecessary
-- but highly profitable -- cancer "treatments" that benefit
no one other than the cancer industry quacks (oncologists).
As first published
in Natural News:
The report
drops a few major bombshells on the way that many cancers are diagnosed.
Breast cancer, for instance, is sometimes not breast cancer at all
but rather a benign condition such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
However, untold millions of women with DCIS have been misdiagnosed
as having breast cancer, and subsequently treated for a condition
that likely never would have caused them any health problems. And
similarly in men, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
(HGPIN), a type of premalignant precursor to cancer, is commonly
mistreated as if it was actual cancer.
"The practice
of oncology in the United States is in need of a host of reforms
and initiatives to mitigate the problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment
of cancer, according to a working group sanctioned by the National
Cancer Institute," explains Medscape.com about the study. "Perhaps
most dramatically, the group says that a number of premalignant
conditions, including ductal carcinoma in situ and high-grade prostatic
intraepithelial neoplasia, should no longer be called 'cancer.'"
Bill Sardi,
author of "You Don't Have to Be Afraid of Cancer Anymore"
also adds this:
Overdiagnosis
refers to the detection by screening (mammograms, PSA tests) of
cancers that would not have become apparent to a doctor or produce
symptoms detectable to the patient before an individual died of
other causes. Cancer is prevalent, far beyond the number diagnosed
in human populations, and most adults will die with, but not of,
their cancer. Treatment and invasive or toxic screening methods
(radiation from x-rays, mammograms, needle biopsies) for tumors
that may never progress to cause symptoms or death in an individual's
lifetime would represent overdiagnosis and needless treatment.
The truth
about cancer is slowly emerging as cancer industry quackery gets
exposed
The good news
in all this is that if you've just been diagnosed with cancer, you
may be a victim of medical quackery and not really have life-threatening
cancer at all.
The first and
most important step in any cancer diagnosis is to be skeptical of
your oncologist and get informed rather than frightened. Don't get
suckered into a toxic chemotherapy treatment by the cancer quacks
who hilariously call themselves doctors. Instead, get educated,
get a second opinion and get yourself a holistic or naturopathic
physician to learn about a vast array of treatment options, lifestyle
changes and other interventions that can prevent, treat or even
reverse cancer.
Think about
it: Even the National Cancer Institute's own scientists publicly
admit that many cancer diagnoses are FAKE and shouldn't be
called "cancer" at all. But the quack cancer doctors keep
calling them cancer because that's what earns them more patients
and revenues. They aren't interested in a truthful diagnosis; they're
interested in scaring you into unnecessary chemotherapy!
That's how
the cancer industry has exploded to $100 billion a year in treatment
revenues. As also published on Natural News:
In America
today, more money is spent to treat cancer than to treat any other
disease by far. In fact, according to NBC News, 100 BILLION dollars
was spent on cancer drugs just last year alone...
If you are
diagnosed with cancer in America today and you choose to trust the
medical system with your treatment, you can say goodbye to your
financial future. Even if you have health insurance, you will probably
end up flat broke one way or the other. Either you will survive
and be flat broke, or you will die flat broke.
The following
is how one woman described her experience with chemo...
This highly
toxic fluid was being injected into my veins. The nurse administering
it was wearing protective gloves because it would burn her skin
if just a tiny drip came into contact with it. I couldn't help asking
myself "If such precautions are needed to be taken on the outside,
what is it doing to me on the inside?" From 7 pm that evening,
I vomited solidly for two and a half days. During my treatment,
I lost my hair by the handful, I lost my appetite, my skin colour,
my zest for life. I was death on legs.
Don't become
a victim of the FAKE cancer industry
Don't let yourself
be victimized by a fake medical diagnosis from a cancer industry
doctor. Learn the truth about cancer and take back your health from
the real cancer quacks (oncologists) who profit from ignorance and
fear. [Editor's note: Even though some of the honest oncologists
believe they are offering you the best treatment available, in reality
they are not. But they can only offer what they are taught to offer.
So the primary problem is with current medical education, but since
that is driven by profit, the system does not work in the best interests
of the end-user (patients).
======================================================
"Chemotherapy
Success Rates Are Growing"
No,
they are not!
How
the statistical success rates of conventional
cancer treatments are being exaggerated
Anybody who
is 40 or 50 years old, recalls the term abnormal cells,
which is best described as any abnormal cell with the absence of
cancer. But oncologists are no longer allowed to call them abnormal
cells! They must call them Stage 0 Cancer or Carcinoma
in Situ! Both can be thought of as intentional fear mongering
terms to scare people into chemotherapy who do not need it.
Read the Institute
of Cancers own definition of Stage 0 Cancer as found here.
A
group of abnormal cells that remain in the place where they first
formed. They have not spread. These abnormal cells may become
cancer and spread into nearby normal tissue. Also called carcinoma
in situ.
Apparently,
the North American field of oncology did not take the news too well
when the Royal College of Oncologists in the UK, identified that
chemotherapy only had a 2.4% success rate at a 5 year mortality
across all cancers in the United States, so the industry needed
to find a way to increase those numbers. (This "misrepresentative
statistics" also occurs when looking at the "five year
survival rate" stat, which has seemed to improve, with the
medical industry taking credit and implying that better treatments
are the reason. But careful analysis shows that it is earlier
detection that's responsible for the apparent improvement in
survival time, and not because of "getting the cancer earlier",
but because the "five year counter" is started earlier...
the survival rate is shown to have not improved when
earlier detection is factored in.)
Instead of
looking into better treatments, like the ones above, the industry
opted to define a new cancer (which specifically indicates that
no cancer is present), and include that in their statistical successes.
Dont
be fooled by embellished numbers. 95% of all cancers (which are
the soft tissue cancers like breast, prostate, brain, lung, skin,
ovarian, uterine) have, at best, a 5% chance of reversal through
chemo and radiation, while the treatments above give you better
odds, and are non-toxic.
======================================================
Food and Cancer
From Cancerologist
Dr. Bruce Ames* Regarding "Mutagenesis, Carcinogenesis,
and the Degenerative Diseases of Aging"
Cooking food
is plausible as a contributor to cancer. A wide variety of chemicals
are formed during cooking. Four groups of chemicals that cause tumors
in rodents have attracted attention because of mutagenicity, potency,
and concentration:
1. Nitrosamines
are formed from nitrogen oxides present in gas flames or from other
burning. Surprisingly little work has been done on the levels of
nitrosamines in fish or meat cooked in gas ovens or barbecued, considering
their mutagenic and carcinogenic potency.
2. Heterocyclic
amines are formed from heating amino acids or proteins.
3. Polycyclic
hydrocarbons are formed from charring meat.
4. Furfural
and similar furans are formed from heating sugars. Heating fat generates
mutagenic epoxides, hydroperoxides, and unsaturated aldehydes.
*
Dr. Ames is a Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Center,
University of California, Berkeley. He is a member of the National
Academy of Sciences and was on their Commission on Life Sciences.
He was formerly on the board of directors of the National Cancer
Institute (National Cancer Advisory Board). He was the recipient
of the most prestigious award for cancer research, the General Motors
Cancer Research Foundation Prize (1983), the highest award in environmental
achievement, the Tyler Prize (1985), the Gold Medal Award of the
American Institute of Chemists (1991), and the Glenn Foundation
Award of the Gerontological Society of America (1992). He has been
elected to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Japan Cancer
Association, and the Academy of Toxicological Sciences. His 300
scientific publications have resulted in his being the 23rd most-cited
scientist (in all fields) (1973-1984).]
Recommended
reading:
The
Secrets of the Cooking Pan
Naturopathic
doctor forced to shut her clinic after wave of death threats and
government regulator pressure
======================================================
======================================================
Cancer
Can Be Killed
by Jeff Witzeman
Cancer
Can Be Killed is my quest to find out why my wifes life was
threatened by doctors here in the United States. Why on earth would
they perform barbaric procedures that would give her only a 50%
chance of survival? Why were they able to kill the cancer in 30
days naturally with no chemo, no radiation and no radical surgery
in Germany?
I followed
the lives of 15 success stories, treated both here and abroad to
find out what works and why. I hope this film gives you the strength
and courage to find the non-toxic cure for you and your loved ones.
The entire
film can be viewed on Amazon.
WHERE TO
GO FOR TREATMENT
Since so many
contacts I receive ask this question, let me address it here.
So you or your
loved one has cancer and the only options your health care coverage
offers are radical surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Or maybe
they are telling you, you are a candidate for immunotherapy. Of
course all of these are toxic options and you know you want better.
So the first task in my opinion (once you get over the shock of
getting the diagnosis) is to OWN the cancer. And by that I mean
taking the position that you played a part in creating it, and therefore
you can play a part in eliminating it. Do some research online to
find out what other people have done successfully. Contact them
if possible on social media and ask them what is possible.
There are many
holistic or naturopathic doctors around the world that have experience
with treating cancer naturally. You can certainly start there by
calling someone local and finding out what they do and what their
success rate has been. The film Cancer
Can Be Killed featured two clinics in the United States
Nature Works
Best in Tempe, Arizona and Utopia
Wellness in Clearwater, Florida. The two clinics in Germany
were Infusio
and Marinus
Am Stein. Germancancerclinics.com
offers a referral service for your specific cancer to a natural
clinic in Germany. And then there are great clinics in Mexico, Switzerland
and even the Philippines. One can do a search on the Internet to
find them. The Gerson
therapy has been around for a long time with a great track record
and they are located in Mexico and San Diego.
Of course most
of this is not covered by insurance . . . yet . . . (see the petition),
so how does one pay for it? You would be surprised how many people
want to contribute to paying for you to recover from cancer. So
start a crowd funding campaign. Post it on social media. Once you
know where you are going and what they are doing, sell your friends
and family why this is the greatest thing ever. Point them to the
Cancer
Can Be Killed film if they need convincing.
Here are two great
resources Chris
Beat Cancer and Cancer
Tutor. Both have great information with videos, treatment and
clinic options.
Finally, use
your insurance for all its worth. Ask your doctor to do blood
testing for micronutrients and metals or toxins and urine testing
for hormones. Once they find the imbalance, you can use this information
to confer with your [knowledgeable] naturopath what specific supplements
can aid in recovery. If you are a breast cancer patient, find out
where the estrogen or hormone imbalance is coming from and what
options there are to balance that out. If you have to use a pharmaceutical
option, then look at it as a short term solution that you can eventually
replace.
Why
can't my Dad understand how these therapies are a better approach?!!
It's psychologically
difficult for some people to accept that there are better
treatments than those offered by the conventional medical
model, because to accept that this is true suddenly means
they can't rely on the health care system anymore, and that
they must take total responsibility for their own health and
treatment options which is mind-boggling.
So to
avoid that overwhelming feeling of dread/fear/self-doubt,
their brains as a self-defense mechanism simply
choose to disbelieve that there can be anything better than
modern medicine. And no amount of evidence to the contrary
will shake their firm belief in the medical model. Once you
realize this is who you're dealing with, to continue trying
to convince this person is just a waste of time. It's like
trying to teach a pig to sing... it will just frustrate the
pig and you. Sad, but true.
The people
who get the most out of the above "alternative"
therapies are those who are open-minded, not afraid of taking
responsibility for doing something themselves, and it helps
to be aware of the profit-motives of the pharmaceutical and
medical industries (not talking about the doctors and nurses).
|
Top
Oncologist Blows Whistle:
'Ivermectin proven more effective than chemotherapy'
without any of the debilitating side-effects,
according to world-renowned Canadian oncologist Dr. William
Makis who cited a major international cancer study.
|
Click the above
box to see the entire paper
|